^ # M

W'- 5»«v y^k' tm m^- ifw"' ^»

■■- M i^ w^

^. r-- K,..-i*: # 1*^ W 1.

■•'^^ - ■-liin 'ii» If* 1^

site- U*'V fe^v Ufe/*'"-*^- fc'^ u*i '\k^-- W./ t

)i^?. ](SEv-r- jSw* ™,

^il i#! m^ m i# .^^ '^^

^ I* m- # ^- 'r# "^ 1^

" ■^~^- i# % '^ i^^"^^ '

1^ . If ^, . ^!. •^ ^' W- '^ W V- m

^,.mM •

ft ii^^s S^ m ^,.ji

,..r !# ^'

M te i^: i:/'|

:;'•'■#•"■ 'fe;-'|^v, |«r:"l^- |s^/ 1...

:B...^^.

r^ ' .1^- K?fc-

T^" k.

l^'' 1^

.Jr- .ii~^.. i>';

%t M "^

\.^. ^h M ^h V

.^^

■A o

V'^'

^-..c,^^

<i>

:- '-^^0^ r^^^'^. -ov^^ ;^^'^ ^-^^0^ r^^^M': -ov^

^4\^

pa5t7io95

SlauGS.

BY

B. O. FLOWER.

Richly Illustrated with Six Photo- gravure and Twenty-five Text Cuts.

F^rioe-- IS Cei^ts.

BOSTON, MASS.:

ARENA PUBLISHING CO.

Copley Square.

1892.

The Rise of the

Swiss Republic

By W, D. ncCRACKAN, A. M.

With Large Colored Map and Full-Page Portrait of the Author.

T

HE Arena PuBLTSHi>rG Compaxy take great pleasure in announcing that they have just issued a brilliant history of the Swiss Re- public, which deals in a popular yet scholarly manner with this ideal republic, which is attracting the attention of thoughtful Americans as is no other foreign nation in the world to-day. The author has devoted five years of careful study to this work. A large portion of this time has been spent in Switzerland, and every important locality has been visited and studied that a clear and in- W. D. MccitACKAN, A. M. telligent idea of the events described might be presented. The archives of the little republic have yielded much information little known even to the continental reader. This work is scholarly, yet written in a popular style, and will be a delight alike to the student and general reader. It is also of special value to thoughtful Americans, as it contains comparative chapters where the two republics are contrasted. -

SPECIAL FEATURES.

AMONG the special features of this volume are chapters on the recent experimental innovations made by the Swiss Republic, the revised Constitution of Switzerland (1874), a general reference index to works by Swiss authorities, and a handsomely colored map of Switzerland.

It contains over four hundred images, printed from new and handsome type on a fine quality of heavy paper. The margins are wide, and the volume is richly bound in cloth.

PRICE, POST=PAID, $3.00.

Address all orders, ARENA PUBLISHING COMPANY, Copley Square, Boston, Mass.

F=OR SKUB BV THE TRKDB. XXX

FASHION'S SLAVES.

BY

/

/A-

B; O. FLOWER, ^

Editor of the "Arena.

ILLUSTRATED.

^Hren^Pres^^

BOSTON, MASS.

THE ARENA PUBLISHING CO.,

COPLEY SQUARE.

1892.

\s

X

0^

r-

L

I 1 -J

FASHION'S SLAVES.

BY B. O. FLOWER.

The last session of the International Council of "Women discussed no question of greater importance to civilization than that of dress reform. The fact that this world's con- gress, repi-esenting the most thoughtful, conscientious, and broad-minded women of our age, has taken up this subject with a firm determination to accomplish a revolution which shall mean health and happiness to the oncoming generation, is itself a prophecy pregnant with promise of a substantial and enduring reform. It will not be surprising if in the near future it is found that this earnest though somewhat timid discussion marked a distinct step in the world's progress ; certainly it was the most significant and authoritative utter- ance from united womanhood that has yet been made touch- ing a problem which most vitally affects civilization.

To the student of sociology nothing is more perplexing or discouraging than society's persistency in blindly clinging to old standards and outgrown ideals which can no longer be defended by reason ; and this is nowhere more marked than in the social world where fashion has successfully defied all true standards of art, principles of common sense, rules of hygiene and what is still more important, the laws of ethics which underlie all stable or enduring civi- lizations.

At the very threshold of this discussion, I ask the reader to, as far as possible, divest his mind of all prejudice arising from preconceived opinions, and view in a perfectly candid and judicial manner this problem upon which the last word will not be spoken until woman is emancipated. As long as free discussion is tabooed and conservatism finds it possible to dismiss the question with a flippant jest, a ribald joke, or a basely unjust imputation, the old order will stand ; partly because woman feels her helplessness and largely because so few people stop to trace cause and effect or patiently reason upon results of the most serious character. Conservatism is

strongly entrenched in the minds of the millions, and to a certain degree mental lethargy broods over the world. It is true that in woman's sphere to-day mental activity is more marked than in any other age, and the best brains and most thoughtful women of our time are boldly denouncing the bondage of fashion and bravely pleading for such radical reforms in dress as will secure to womanhood liealth and comfort, while being genuinely artistic and graceful, breath- ing true refinement and conforming to cssthetic principles rather than the caprice of fashiou. To me there is some- thing infinitely pathetic in the brave protests that have from time to time flashed from the outraged sensibilities of those who represent the very flower of American womanhood, when discussing this subject, for running through their almost every utterance is the plaintive note of helplessness, mingled with the consciousness of the justice of the cause for which they plead. The talented and universally respected Mrs. AblxT, Woolson Gould some years ago thus gave ex- pression to her feelings when writing of the long, heavy, disease-producing skirts of women :

Do wliat we will with them, they still add enormouslj' to the weight of clothing, prevent cleanliness of attii'e about the ankles, overheat by their tops the lower portion of the body, impede loco- motion, and invite accidents. In short, they are uncomfortable, unhealthy, unsafe, and unmanageable. Convinced of this fact by patient and almost fruitless attempts to remove their objectionable qualities, the earnest dress-reformer is loath to believe that skirts hanging below the knee are not transitory features in woman's attire, as similar features have been in the dress of men, and surely destined to disappear with the tight hour-glass Avaists and other monstrosities of the present costume. . . . Any changes the wisest of us can to-day propose are onl}'- a mitigation of an evil which can never be done away till women emerge from this vast swaying, undefined, and indefinable mass of drapery into the shape God gave to His human beings.

Mary A. Livermore voices a sad and terrible truth when she obserA'es :

The invalidism of young girls is usually attributed to every cause but the right one ; to hard study — co-education — which, it is said, compels overwork that the girl student may keep up Avith the young men of her class ; too much exercise, or lack of rest and quiet at certain periods when nature demands it. All

the while the physician is silent concerning the glove-fitting, steel- clasped corset, the heavy, dragging skirts, the bands engirding the body, the pinching, deforming boot, and the ruinous social dissipation of fashionable society. These will account for much of the feebleness of young women and girls. For they exhaust nervous force, make freedom of movement a painful impossibility, and frequently shipwreck the young girl before she is out of port.

We have a theory, generally accepted in civilized society, which we never formulate in s])eech but to which we are very loyal in practical life. This theory, put in plain language, is as follows : God knows how to make boys ; and, when He sends a boy into the world, it is safe to allow him to grow to manhood as God made liim. He may be too tall or too short, for our notions, too stout or too thin, too light or too dark. Nevertheless, it is right, for God knows how to make boys. But when God sends a girl into the world, it is not safe to allow her to grow to womanhood as He has made her. Some one must take her and improve her figure, and give her the shape in which it is proper for her to grow.

Accordingly, the young girl comes some day from the dress- maker with this demand : '^ Mnie. (the dressmaker) says

that I am getting into horrid shape, and must have a pair of cor- sets immediately." The corsets are bought and worn, and the physical deterioration begins.

Miss Frances E. Willard thus touchingly refers to the bon- dage of fashion :

" But there came a day — alas ! the day of my youth — on which I was as literally caught out of the fields and pastures as was ever a young colt; confronted by a long dress that had been ma«le for me, corsets and high-heeled shoes that had been l)Ought, hair-pins and ribbons for my straying locks, and I was told that it simply ' wouldn't answer ' to ' run wild ' another day. Com- pany from the city was expected ; I must be made presentable ; ' I had got to look like other folks.'

" That was a long time ago, but I have never known a single physically reasonable day since that sweet May morning, when I cried in vain for longer lease of libert}'."

Mrs. Frances E. Russell, whose significant paper read at the Woman's Council elicited universal approbation, in the following extract from her able essay in The Arena sounds a more hopeful note than her illustrious predecessors, for she is nearer the dawn, and the horizon of woman's freedom is broadening :

The fiction tliat women have no legs is now fully discredited, for in the show windows of the largest dry goods stores stand dummies of the female figure dress-ed only in the combination undersuit made of wool or silk " tights," covering the whole body, except the head, hands, and feet. By this time everyone must know that woman, like man, is a biped. Can anyone give a good reason why she must lift an unnecessary weight of clothing with every step she takes,^ pushing forward folds of restricting drapery and using almost constantly, not only her hands, but her mental power and nervous enei'gy to keep her skirts neat and out of the way of harm to herself and others?

Much discussion has been wasted over the question whether a woman should carry the burden of her voluminous drapery from the shoulders or the hips. Why must she carry this unnecessary weight at all ?

Now let us join hands, all lovers of liberty, in earnest co-oper- ation to free American women from the dominion of foreign fashion. Let us, as intelligent Avomen, Avith the aid and encour- agement of all good men, take this important matter into our own hands and provide ourselves with convenient garments ; a cos- tume that shall say to all beholders that we are equipped for rea- sonable service to humanity.

Conservative critics have so frequent!}^ misrepresented those who have honestly pleaded for dress reform, that it is no longer safe to be frank, and this fact alone has con- strained numbers of earnest writers from expressing their sentiments who have felt it their duty to speak in behalf of health, beauty, and common sense ; indeed so certain is one to be misrepresented who handles this subject in anything like a reasonable and unconventional manner, and so surely will his views be assailed as improper, owing to the age-long cast of conventional thought, that were it not that this ques- tion so intimately affects fundamental, ethical, and hygienic laws, and bears such a vitally important relation to true progress, I frankly admit that I doubt whether I should have the courage to discuss it. But I find it impossible to remain silent, believing as I do most profoundly that the baleful artificial standards so long tolerated must be abolished, that the fetish of the nineteenth century civilization must be overthrown, and that it is all-important that people be thor- oughly acquainted with the far-reaching and basic signifi- cance of this problem, through courageous and persistent agitation and education, in order that manhood and woman-

From 18C0 to 18C5. The era of hoop-skirts.

structive to life and health, and degrading to womanhood have been readily sanctioned by conventionalism. This antago- nistic attitude toward any movement for an improvement in woman's attire founded on the laws of health, art, com- fort, and common sense was characteristically expressed in a recent editorial in a leachng Boston daily, wherein the writer solemnly ob- served :

The simple truth is, the great majority of the women appreciate the fact that it is their missioji to be beautiful^ and the

hood be brought up to the ethical plane which marks enduring civilization. In the examination of this subject I desire to very briefly notice it from a'sthctie, hygienic, and ethical points of view. It is a singular fact that every effort made toward a healthful a n d common sense r e f o r m i n woman's apparel has been assail- ed as inartistic or i m moral; while fashions at once disgusting, indecent, d e -

From 18G0 to 18G5. The hoop-skirt era. The difficult feat of tying on a bonnet.

dress reformers have never yet devised any gar- ment to assist the women in fulfilling this mis- sion.

The author of the above fairly represents the attitude of conventional thought, — its servility to fashion, its antagonism to reformative moves. The implied falsehood that fashion represents beauty and art, or is the servant of sestheticism has been reiterated so often that thousands have accepted it as truth.

In order to expose its falsity, I have repro- duced in this paper plates taken from leading American and English fashion monthlies during the past thi'ee decades, in each of which it is notice- able that ex- 1870 to 1875. The era of the enormous bustle and , train of sweeping iliineni^ions.

tremes nave

been reached. In 1860-65, the hoop-skirt held sway, and the wasp waist was typical of beauty. Then no lady was correctly attired according to the prevailing idea who did not present a spectacle cu- riously suggestive of a moving circus tent. During this era four or live fashionably dressed women completely '\ filled an ordinary drawing-room ; while the sidewalk was often practically mo- nopolized by moving monstrosities, save when in front or behind the formidable swinging cages moved escorts, who with no less servility than American womanhood bowed to the frivolous and criminal caprice of

1870 to 1875. The era of the enormous bustle and j.i inndavn "RciVnrlr^n

train of sweeping dimensions. ^^'^ mouem liaDyiOn.

But fashion is nothing if not changeable; fancy not art guides her mind. What to-day types beauty, is by her own voice to-morrow voted indecent and absurd. Thus "we find in the period extending from 1870 to 1875 an entirely new but none the less ridiculous or injurious extreme pre- vails. The wonderful swinging cage, the diameter of which at the base often equaled the height of the encased figure, has disappeared, being no longer considered desira- ble or ?esthetic, and in its place we have prodigious bus- tles and immense trains, by which an astonishing quantity of material is thrown behind the body, suggesting in some instances a toboggan slide, in others tlie unseemly hump on the back of a camel. This is the era of the enormous bustle and the train of sweeping dimensions.*

When we examine the prevailing styles w^hich marked this period, we are struck with amazement at the power exerted by fashion over the intellect and judgment of society. Imagine the shame and humiliation of a woman of fashion, endowed by nature or afflicted by dis- ease with such an unsightly hump on the back as characterized the fashion- able toilet of this period !

Toward the end of the seventies, we find another extreme reached, which if possible was more absurd and injurious than those which

marked of this was the tie-back, skirts trains fashion's with one

the earl}^ days

decade. This

period of the

or n a r r o w

and enormous

. As in 1860

slaves vied

another in

their effort to cover the largest possible circular space, now their ambi- tions lay in the direction

1870 to 1875. " SiiKge-^ting bogfian slide ; in others, the back of a camel."

in some instances a to- the unseemly hump on

* During this period the ingenuity of man came to woman's rescue, by the invention of an interesting, and, judging by its popularity, exceedingly serviceable contrivance known as a dress elevator, whicli enabled ladies to instantly'elevate their enormous trains when they came to a particularly muddy and tilthy crossing.

10

narrow as

of the opposite extreme:* the skirts must be as

possible even though it greatly

impeded walking, for as will be

readily observed all free use of

the lower limbs was out of the

question during the reign of the

'' tie-back."

The reaction in favor of a more sensible dress which fol- lowed was of brief duration. During this time, however, the long trains were seldom seen, and thoughtful women began to hope that the arbitrary rule of fashion was over. It was not long, however, before the panier period ar- rived, and what was popularly known as the p u 1 1 - back was a c - cepted as the correct style in ,„_„ „, ,...■., , • .

„ . . •' 18<8. The period of the tie-back, narrow skirts, anil enormous

lashion S world. trains.

Of this latter conceit little need be said, for it has so re- cently passed from view that all remember its peculiarity, which to the ordinary observer seemed to be a settled

* It was in the midst of the period of the tie-backs that Harper's ZJosor publislied two striUng cartoons illustrating the poem given below. One represented a poor man's wife, " The slave of toil," and was i)arheticany powerful in its tidelity to trutli ; the other, drawn by the powerful Xast, represented a society lady of the day attired in the reigning tie-back, measuring at the hips a little niore'than double the width a short distance below the knees. This slave was chained to fashion's column.

SISTER SLAVES.

You think there is littleof kinship between them?

Perhaps not in blood, yet there's likeness of soul ; And in bondage 'tis patent to all who have seen them

That both are fast held under iron control. The simjiering girl, with her airs and her graces,

Is sister at heart to the hard-working drudge ; Twotypes of to-day, as they stand in their places;

Whose lot is the sadder Ileave you to judge.

One chained to the block is the victim of Fashion ;

Her object in life to be perfectly dressed ; Too silly for reason, too shallow for i)assion.

She i)asses her days 'neath a tyrant's behest. Thus pinioned and 'fettere<l, and warily moving.

Lest looping sliouUl fail her, or hand come ai)art : Wliat room is there left her for thinking or loving.'

What noble ambition can enter her heart?

11

determination on the part of its origina- tors to render walk- ing as difficult and fatiguing as possible, while fully exposing the outline of the wearer's body below the waist at every step. What in '60 or '70 would have been accounted the height of indecency, is in the eighties per- fectly proper in the fashionable world. During this time it was not enough to have the skirts very narrow, they must at

The tie-backs of 1878 and 18Ti».

every step give the outline of the limbs [or as our Minnesota solon Avould put it, nether limbs], hence we find the pull- backs in which "• two shy knees ap- peared clad in a single trouser."

And one, the worn wife of a grizzled old farmer ; She kneads the great loaves for the " men- folks " to eat. lii the wheat-fields the green blades are spring- ing like armor; Afar in the forests the flowers are sweet. She lifts not her eyes. Within kitchen walls narrow Her life is pent \\\). The most hopeless of slaves, Though weary and jaded in sinew and marrow. She never complains. Women rent in their graves.

Twin victims, for which have wo tenderest pity— For mother and wife toiling on till she dies, Or the frivolous butterfly child of the city.

All blind to the glory of earth and of skies? Is it fate, or ill fortune, hath woven about you Strong meshes which ye are too heli)less to break ? Shall we scornfully wonder, or angrily flout you.

Or strive from their torpor your minds to awake? The pull-back of 188G.

12

Such have been the in- consistencies, incongruities, and absurdities of fashion as illustrated in the past three decades, in view of which one may well ask whether in fashion's eyes women are such paragons of ugliness that these ever- varying styles (introduced, we are seriously informed, to conserve to her beauty,) are absolutely essential, and by what rule of art can we explain the fact that the ponderous hoopskirt was the essential requirement of beauty in the sixties and the enormous bus- tles demanded in the seven- ties. The truth

IK,

all

Fashionable -walking costume early in the seventies. Woman appreciating the fact "that It 1^ her mission to be beautiful." See page 405.

fashion is supreme- indifferent alike to laws of art and

et, Venus of old, with your queenly derision,

How you would disdain the belle's tawdry ar- ray! Free footsteps iititram- ')nel/e<l, cool hand of decision, Sweet laugh like bells jjcaling, were yours in the day When you reigned OA-er men by the' might of your beauty ; Ko fetters were o'er you in body or brain ; The world would bow down in the gladness of duty Could you but awake in your splendor again.

Fashionable walking costume in the earlv sixties Woman appreciating the fact " that it is her mission to be beautiful." See page 405.

And, Pallas and Venus, if now you were holding A talk over womanhood, what would you say,

13

beauty, health and life, decency and propriety — a fact that must be patent to any thoughtful person who examines the prevailing styles of a generation. I submit that the wildest extremes to which well-meaning but injudicious dress reformers have gone in the past have been marked by rioth- ing more inartistic than the costume of the reigning belle in 1860. Each successive decade has been marked by an ex- treme which, surveyed from the vantage ground of the pres- ent, is as ridiculously absurd as it has been wanting in beauty or common sense. Nowhere have the laws of true art been so severely ignored as in the realm of fashion. Yet this view of the problem palls into insignificance when we come to examine the question from the standpoint of health and life.

One would think that after thousands of years of sickness and death, with all the advantages of increased education and a broadening intellectual horizon, we would have arrived at such an appreciation of the value of health and the solemn duty we owe to posterity, as to compel this consideration to enter into our thoughts when we adopted styles of dress ; yet nowhere is the weakness of our present civilization more marked or its hollowness so visible, even to the superficial thinker, as in the realm of fashion, where every coiisideration of health and eveyi of life, and all sense of responsibility to future generations are brushed aside as trivialities not to be seriously considered. In vain have physicians and ph3-siologists written, lectured, and demonstrated the fatal results of yielding to fashion. The learned Doctor Trail in writing on this subject wisely observes :

The evil effects of tight-lacing, or of lacing at all, and of bind- ing the clothing around the hips, instead of suspending it from the shoulders, can never be fully realized Avithout a thorough education in anatomy and physiology. And if the illustrations *

Tlie words of wise counsel while you were unfoldinir,

If some one should show you these pictures to-day? I dream of your faces : divinest compassion

Would yearn the poor toiler to pity and save ; And your hirjreness of scorn would descend on the fashion

Wliich binds, unresisting, the idler a fclave.

* I have reproduced the admirable cuts found in Dr. Trail's physiology, as they were essential to the understanding of the text quoted, anil also because they con- vey more vividly than words the injury necessarily sustained by tliose who persist in outraging nature and violating the laws of their being by improper dress.

14

The iuterual viscera.

here presented should effect the needed reform in fashionable dress, the resulting health and happiness to the human race would be incalculable ; for the health of the mothers of each generation

determines, in a very large measure, the vital stamina of the next. It is obvious that, if the diameter of the chest, at its lower and broader part, is diminished by lacing, or any other cause, to the extent of one fouith or one half, the lungs B, B, are pressed in towards the heart, A, the lower ril^s are drawn together and press on the liver, C, and spleen, E, while the abdominal organs are pressed downward on the pelvic viscera. The stomach, D, is compressed in its tranverse diameter; both the stomach, upper intestines, and liver are pressed dowiiAvard on the kidneys, M, M, and on the lower portions of the bowels [the intestinal tube is denoted by the letters f, j, and k,] while the bowels are crowded down on the uterus, i, and liladder, g. TJivs every vital organ is either functionally obstructed or mechanically disordered., and diseases more or less aggravated, the condi- tion of all. In post- mortem examinations the liver has been found deeply indented by the constant and prolonged pressure of the ribs, in consequence of tight-lacing. The brain-organ, ])rotected by a bony inclosure, has not yet been dis- torted externally by the contrivances of milliners and raantua- makers ; but, lacing the chest, by inter- rupting the circulation of the blood, prevents its free return from the

vessel of the brain, and Anterior view of tliorax The same in afasliionable . in tlie Venus of Med- corset-wearing lady of

SO permanent conges- jcis. to-day.

15

don of that organ, with constant liability to headache, vertioro, or worse affections, becomes a "second nature." The vital re- sources of every person, and all available powers of mind and body, are measurable by the i-espiration. Precisely as the breath- ing is lessened, the length of life is shortened; not only this, but life is rendered correspondingly useless and miserable Avhile it does exist. It is impossible for an}' child, whose mother has diminished her breathing capacity by lacing, to have a sound and vigorous organization. If girls will persist in ruining their vital organs as they grow up to womanhood, and if women yv\\\ continue this destructive habit, the race must inevitably deteri- orate. It may be asserted, therefore, without exaggeration, that not only the welfare of the future generations, but the salvation of the race depends on the correction of this evil habit. The pathological consequences of continued and prolonged pressure on any vital structure are innutrition, congestion, inflammation, and ulceration, resulting in weakness, waste of substance, and destruction of tissue. The normal sensibility of the part is also destroyed. No woman can ever forget the pain she endured when she first applied the corsets ; but in time the compressed organs become torpid ; the muscles lose their contractile power, and she feels dependent on the mechanical support of the corset. But the mischief is not limited to local weakness and in- sensibility. The general strength and general sensibility corres- pond with the breathing capacity. If she has diminished her " breath of life," she has just to that extent destroyed all normal sensibility. She can neither feel nor think normally. But in place of pleasurable sensations and ennobling thoughts, are an in- describable array of aches, pains, weaknesses, irritations, and nameless distresses of body, with dreamy vagaries, fitful impulses, and morbid sentimentalities of mind. And yet another evil is to be mentioned to render the catalogue complete. Every particle of food must be aerated in the lungs before it can be assimilated. It follows, therefore, that no one can be well nourished who has not a full, free, and unimpeded action of the lungs. In the con- tracted chest, the external measurement is reduced one half ; but as the upper portions of the lungs cannot be fully inflated until the lower portions are fully expanded, it follows that the breathing capacity is diminished more than one half. It is wonderful how anyone can endure existence, or long survive, in this devitalized condition ; yet, thousands do, and with careful nursing, manage to bring into the world several sickh^ children. The spinal dis- tortion is one of the ordinary consequences of lacing. No one who laces habitually can have a straight or strong back. The muscles being unbalanced become tiabby or contracted, unable to support the trunk of the body erect, and a curvature, usually a

16

double curvature, of the spine is the consequence. And if any- thincr were needed to aggravate the spinal curvature, intensify the compression of the internal viscera, and add to the general de- formity, it is found in the modern contrivance of stilted gaiters. These are made with heels so high and narrow that locomotion is awkward and painful, the centre of gravity is shifted " to parts unknown," and the head is thrown forwards and the hijDS pro- jected backwards to maintain perpendicularity.

In speaking of the destructiveness to health caused by woman's dress, Prof. Oscar B. Moss, M. D., declares :

Although the corset is the chief source of constrahit to the kidneys, liver, stomach, pancreas, and spleen, forcing them upward to encroach iipon the diaphragm and comj^ressing the lungs and heart, its evils are rivalled by those resulting from suspending the skirts from the waist and hips, by which means the pelvic oi'gans are forced downward and often permanently displaced. Now, add to these errors a belt draAvn snugly around the waist, and we have before us a combination of the most malignant elements of dress Avhich it would be possible to invent.

The waist belt enforces the evils which the corset and skirts inaugixrate. Every proposition of anatomy and physiology bear- ing u])on this subject appeals to reason. Did the abdominal organs require for their well-being less room than Ave find in the economy of nature, less room would have been provided. Natui-e bestows not grudgingly, neither does she lavish beyond the requirements of perfect health.

The same laws Avhich govern the nutrition of muscles, apply also to the vital organs. Pressure that impedes circulation of blood through them must suppress their functions proportionally. With the lungs, heart, and digestive organs impaired by external devices, which force them into abnormal relations, health is impossible. Eveiy other part of the body — nay, life itself — depends upon the perfection of these organs. The ancients fittingly called them the tripod of life.

Consumption, heart disease, dyspepsia, and the multiform phases of uterine and ovarian diseases are among the natural and frequent consequences of compressing the internal organs. Men could not endure such physical indignities as women inflict upon themselves. Should they attempt to do so, they would not long hold the proud position of " bread winners," which is now theirs by virtue of their more robust qualities.

It is difficult to imagine a slavery more senseless, cruel, or far-reaching in its injurious consequences than that imposed

17

by fashion on civilized womanhood during the past generation. Her health has been sacrificed, and in countless instances her life has paid the penalty; while posterity has been dwarfed, maimed, and ener- vated, and in body, mind, and soul deformed at its behests. In turn every part of her body has been tortured. On her head at fashion's caprice the hair of the dead has been piled. Hats and bonnets, wraps and gowns laden with heavy l)eads and jet have as seriously im- paired her health as they have rendered her miserable ; the tight lacing required by the wasp waists has produced generations of invalids and b e -

Street costume. Spring, 1884.

queathed to posterity suf- fering that will not vanish for many decades. By it, as has been pointed out by the authorities cited, every vital organ in the body has been seriously affected. The heart and lungs, by nature protect- ed by a cage of bone, have been abnormally crushed in a space so contracted as to absolutely prohibit the free action upon which health depended; while the downward pressure was necessarily equally injurious to her delicate organism. The tightly drawn corset has proved an unmitigated curse to the living and a legacy of misery and disease to posterity. And this cruel deforming of the most beautiful of God's creations was said to be beautiful simply because

Street costuine. Summer, 1891. (Compare waist M'itli anterior view of thorax of cor.set-wearing lady of to-day.) See page 412.

18

fashion willed it. Nor was this all ; enormous bustles and skirts of prodigious dimension have borne their weight largely upon that part of her body which above all else should be abso- lutely free from pressure. By this means the most sensitive organs have been ruthlessly subjected to down pressing weights which for exquisite torture and for the abso- lute certainty of the long train of agony that must result, rival the heartless ingenuity of the Inquisition of the Middle Ages. Beyond this generation of debilitated and invalided mothers, rises a countless posterity robbed of its birthright of health while yet unborn.* A possible genius deformed and dwarfed by the weight of a fashionable dress ; a brain which might have been brilliant rendered idiotic by the constant pressure of a corset, and the weari- some weight of a "stylish" dress pressing about the hips ; a child whose natural capacity might have carried him to the seat of a Webster or into the laboratory of an Edison, con- demned to drag a weakly, diseased, or deformed body through life, with mind ever chained to the flesh, through the heart- less imposition which fashion imposed on his mother ! What thought can be more appalling to a conscientious Avoman ? Yet until a revolution is accomplished and a reign of i-eason and common sense inaugurated, this crime against the unborn will continue. But some argue the days of these extremes are past.

I answer not past, but they are assuming other forms. Since

* In discuf5sing; the solemn duty mothers owe to their offspring, Mrs. Annie Jenness Miller sensibly observes : —

Are women ifinorant of the mischief they do to their offspring, or are they indif- ferent to consequences ? Has the true maternal love become extinct, in this age of advanced civilization, that women ignore all the laws of nature while anticipating the glory of motherhood? We know not; yet we often see what causes a thrill of pity in our soul for the future of the child yet unborn : a mother laced within stiff bones and steel, while the very instincts of being cry out against the sin of it. Surely every child has a right to be well born! Wealth maybe a grand inheritance, but health is a better ( ne, as any poor suffering creature will testify, whose misery the most expensive doctors have been called upon to alleviate without avail. And how can a child be well born unless its parents observe the laws of life bearing upon the birth and rearing of children ? It is impossible. If a mother will so clothe herself that the vitality which properly belongs to her baby becomes exhausted and de- stroyed, the child is robbed, as a natural consequence, and perhaps the weakened, jniny, distorted, fretful little creature, who is innocent of the cause of its own sviffer- ings, will live to become a curse to the world instead of the blessing that it would have been had rational conditions been observed before its birth.

Tight corsets grudgingly loosened a quarter of an inch at a time, heavy skirts, and all the evil conditions we are so familiar with, are still retained as the months pass, bringing ever nearer what should be the very happiest hour of wcmian's existence — that in which she is to be intrusted with the keeping, training, and guidance of a new human soul. Perhaps her baby comes into the world dead or deformed, perhaps deprived of certain of its faculties; or it maybe that it possesses life and all of its special senses and organs in such a diminished degree that the whole of its future becomes a pain rather than a joy, while its miserable, puny structure remains a last- ing reproach to its parents as long as they live.

1878 ViGAKIES OF FASHIOX.

188G PREVAILIXG STYLES IX AVALKING COSTUMES DUKIXG THE PAST THIRTY YEARS. 19

20

1890 dawned, the evils in some respects have been aggra- vated ; for it must not be forgotten that the daughters of the present decade have, in order to be fashionable, compressed beyond all healthful bounds the flesh of their arms, retarding circulation and inviting pneumonia and other ills. And in order to look s^tylish, thousands of women wear dress waists so tight that no free movement of the upper body is possible ; indeed in numbers of instances ladies are compelled to put their bonnets on before attempting the painful ordeal of getting into their glove-fitting dress waists. Many young women to-day, yielding to the spell of fashion, place the corset next to their flesh, while a still greater number have merely the thinnest possible undershirt between the flesh and the corset, after Avhich they tightly draw the dress waist until it meets. This seems incredible, but it is vouched for by several ladies of my acquaintance, among whom are physicians whose large practice among their sisters gives them peculiar facilities for knowing the absolute facts. Health, posterity, and all the instincts of the higher self are ruthlessly sacrificed to the fickle foll}^ of fashion's criminal caprice. And we must not forget that even now the sweep- ing train is coming in vogue and correctly attired ladies must consent to carry the germs of death with quantities of filth from the streets of our metropolitan cities into their homes of wealth and refinement. The corset and high-heeled shoes, the two most deadly foes to maternity and posterity, are also seen at the present time, on every hand.

If outraged nature could show the procession of mothers sacrificed on fashion's altar during the past geneiation, or unveil the suffering and deformity being borne by posterity at the present time, through this slavery, the world would be thrilled with an indescribable horror. Health, comfort, and human life have paid the penalty of a criminal servitude to the modern juggernaut, before whose car millions of our women are bowing in abject servility, knowing full well that at each turn of its wheel new pains or fresh diseases will be inflicted. And what power controls and gives life to this mistress of modern civilization? At whose behest is this crime against reason, life, and posterity perpetrated ? The cupidity of the shreu'd and unscrupulous mid the caprice of the shallow and frivolous.

The moral aspect of this subject is even more grave than

21

the hygienic. Anything which injures the physical body, whether it be licen- tiousness, intemperance, gluttony, or vicious modes of dress, is necessarily evil from an ethical point of view. Not simply because the law of our being decrees that whatever drains or destroys the physical vitality must sooner or later sap the vital forces of the brain ; but also because anything is ethically des- tructive which chains the mind to the realm of animality, when, unfettered, it should be unfolding in spiritual strength and glory. Thus it will be readily seen that any article of cloth- ing which presses upon the vitals of the body so as to cause displacement of the delicate organism, or so cumbersome as to cause general fatigue, anything, as is the case with throws the body

hio'h

leels, out

equilibrium, or cle of dress which of the

scious

Vagaries of Fashion. A

Vagaries of Fasliion. A belle early in the sixties.

which of its

any arti- belle in the eighties.

makes the mind ever con- body by virtue of its uncomfortableness, is injurious from an ethical })oint of view. This fact -w hu h has been so gen- eiall} overlooked will be- come more a p J) arent, if for the sake of il- lustrati o n we suppose for a mo- ment that a plant is end owed with reas- o n and s e nsation,

22

and obeying the general law of its being, and the persua- sive and inspiring influence of the sun and rain, is strug- gling to rise heavenward, and give to the radiant world above its impearled wealth — its gorgeous bloom, its mar- vellous fragrance and fruit ; but by virtue of the bonds of a prison-house below, — a small pot or a rocky encasement, its life work is thwarted, its bloom, perfume, and fruit, if they come at all, are stunted, limited, and imperfect. For generations woman's condition has been like that of the plant, the wealth of her nature has been dwarfed, the mar- vellous richness of her life has been marred by the impris- oned conditions of her body, and infinitely more sad and far-reaching have been the baleful consequences upon mil- lions of her offspring, dwarfed, weakly, sickly, enfeebled in body and soul. A another whose thoughts have voluntarily or involuntarily been held in the atmosphere of the physical nature, necessarily imparts to her child a legacy of ayiimal- ity which, like the corpse of a dead being, clings to the soul throughout its pilgrimage. Terrible as have been fashion's ravages on woman's physical health, the curse which she has exerted when the ethical aspect of the case is entertained, far transcends it.

It is a curious fact that almost all the opposition from women to proposed reforms in woman's dress comes from two extremes in societ3^ Those who do no independent thinking, taking all their thoughts and opinions from the expressed views of the men with whom they associate, and the profoundly earnest and thoughtful, but conserva- tive women of society. The opposition of the former class is merely the echo of husbands, brothers, fathers, and lovers ; but the others are moved by conviction, and for this reason their views are worthy of consideration. They fear that any radical change will exert an immoral influence. Their minds are swayed by ancient thought which tliroughout all ages lias cast its baleful shadow over the brain of the world. They are held under the spell of a conservatism which unquestioningly tolerates established institutions and existing orders, bnt has no confidence in aught that pro- poses to break with these, even though the new has rea- son and common sense clearly on its side. Thus time and again fashions have been tolerated, although known to be morally enervating and singularly repulsive to all refined sensibilities ;

23

and we shall cease simply because it is which we have been

while proposals from without for reforms based on the laAvs of health and beauty have called forth the most determined opposition from this conscientious class, merely because the proposed innovations have not conformed to ideas entertained by virtue of prevailing fashions, and have been therefore regarded immoral. And herein lies an important point to be considered. Anything which is radically unlike pre- vailing standards or styles to which we have become accus- tomed will impress most persons as being immodest or indecent. The ujiusual in dress is usually denounced as immoral because we are all prone to allow our prejudice to obscure our reason and o'ersway our judgment. This point must be recognized before any real reform can be accom- plished. When humanity has grown sufficiently wise to reason broadly and view problems on their own merits, aside from preconceived opinion or inherited prejudice, real instead of false standards of morality will prevail,

to condemn anything as pernicious unusual, radically unlike that to

accustomed or revolutionary in its tendency. Let me make this if possible more apparent by an illustration, because it bears such ^^ an important

relation to the main issue. If M^ "^sn had for ages worn long flowing robes, com- f^^y pletely envel- oping their bodies, but on a certain day with one accord exchanged them for a cos- turns similar to that now seen throughout the civil- ized world, society would experience a distinct shock ; immoral, indecent, pernicious, and vulgar would mildly express the sentiment of conventional thought, until the same society had become ac- customed to the change. To us at the present time it is difficult to conceive how women of sense and refinement submitted to

righted photo ly Sarony.

MAKY AXDEUSON AS PAKTHEKIA.

25

the swinging-cage paraphernalia of the sixties, or the Grecian bend of a later date. Yet in those days the severely plain skirts of the present would have seemed positively indecent. It has been necessary to dwell on this thought in order to sufficiently remove existing prejudice to enable a fair consid- eration of the question in its broader aspects. I have also introduced fair examples of prevailing fashions during the past generation and reproductions of Greek, Shakespearian and other simple costumes worn at the present time by the queens of the stage, to show by comparison how infinitely more graceful, beautiful, comfortable, healthful, and by their very elements of comfort and healthfulness, ethically supe- rior, are these costumes to those which conventionalism sanc- tioned in the sixties, seventies, and eighties. Is there anj'thing immodest, indecent, or suggestive of impropriety in Mar}^ Anderson in the graceful Grecian costume of Parthenia, presented on the preceding page ? Of the tens of thousands of people who have witnessed the performances of Madame Modjeska, Miss Anderson, Julia Marlowe, or Mar- garet Mather in the costumes given in this paper, it is not probable that a perceptible number have seen aught improper or even injuriously suggestive, notwithstanding they are so radically unconventional. Surely no mind accustomed to think broadly and view problems on all sides, and unaccus- tomed to revel in the sewer of sensualism would see in the attire of these estimable ladies aught but costumes at once graceful, refined, and apparently infinitely more comfortable and healthful than those represented in any of the fashion plates I have reproduced, and which millions of women of good sense have under the stress of conventionalism been compelled to wear. Let us compare Miss Anderson's Grecian costume with the dress of a society belle in the seventies, which required from twenty to thirty yards of material, and when completed and fitted transformed the wearer into a monstrosity with an unsightly hump on the back, and a street cleaner of immense dimensions trailing for several feet in her rear.

From artistic, hygienic, economical, and ethical points of view, to say nothing of conmion sense and comfort, is not the simple and beautiful costume of Parthenia incomparably superior to that which marked the second decade of the past generation? Would not woman to-day clotlied in close-

From copurtgiued pliotu byFalk, N. Y.

JULIA MARLOWE.

HELENA MODJESKA.

MARGARET MATHER.

•26

HELENA MODJESKA.

27

fitting garments of silk or woollen fabric, with an outer robe or loose dress fashioned something after the order of the ancient Grecian or Roman pattern, be far more beautiful than she is as a slave to fashion's fickle fancy, while the require- ments of life, health, and comfort would be fully met ? Again, let us compare one of the plates of the sixties with its won- derful expanse of skirt to tlie simple, graceful attire of Miss Marlowe as Viola in the " Twelfth Night," and laying aside all preconceived opinions (with the influence which we have seen the unusual plays in fashioning our ideas of propriety,) does not our reason and common sense sustain the view that the latter is far more refined, simple, and less vulgarly ostentatious than the inflated garment of the early sixties? Or if we compare the pictures of Modjeska and Miss Marlowe in Shakespearian roles, or that of the former in the neat and graceful gathered gown, and Miss Mather in the simple peasant dress, are they not one and all far more chaste, artistic, sensible, and healthful than the hoop-skirt, bustle, and train, or the tie-back ? Do not, however, understand that I advocate the introdnction of any of these costumes. It is for woman and woman alone to decide what she will wear, and in this paper I am merely seeking to second the splendid work that has by her been inaugurated, and by speaking as one of the younger men of this decade, to voice what I believe American womanhood will find to be the sentiment of the rising generation, whenever she makes a concerted effort to emancipate herself from the slavery of Parisian fashions. There are many evidences that the hour is ripe for a sensible revolt, and that if the movement is guided by wise and judicious minds it will be a success. Two things seem to me to be of paramount importance.

(1.) The commission of women acting for the Council should decide definitely upon the nature and extent of changes desired. The ideal costume should be clearly defined and ever present in their mind. But it would be exceedingly unwise to attempt any radical change at once. This has been more than anything the secret of the partial or total failures of the movements of this character in the past. The changes should be gradually made. Every spring and autumn let an advance step be taken, and in order to do this an American fashion commission or bureau should be established, under the auspices of the dress reform com-

MISS MARLOWE AS VIOLA.

29

mittee of the Women's Council, which at stated intervals should issue bulletins and illustrated fashion plates. If the ideal is kept constantly in view, and every season slight changes are made toward the desired garment, the victory will, I believe, be a comparatively easy one, for the splendid common sense of the American women and men will cordially second the movement. Concerted action^ a clearly defined ideal toward which to move, and grad^ial changes — these are points which it seems to me are vitally important. One reason why the most ridiculous and inartistic extremes in fashion have been generally adopted is found in this policy of gradual introduction, a fact which must impress anyone who carefully examines the fashions of the past. First there has been a slight alteration, shortly becoming more pronounced, and with each season it has grown more marked, although perhaps not for four or six years has the extreme been reached. At every step there have been complaints from various quarters, but steadily and persistently has the fashion been pushed until it reached its climax, after which we have had its gradual decline. This was the history of the hoop skirt and the Grecian bend, and has been that of most of the extremes which have marked the past, and we can readily believe that in no other way could womanhood have been insnared by such supreme and criminal folly as has characterized fashion's caprices in unnumbered instances.

(2.) Another very essential point is the proper education of the girls of to-day, for to them will fall, in its richest fruition, the blessings of this splendid reform if it be properly carried on, and if they be everywhere instructed to set health above fashion, and seek the beauty of Venus de Medici rather than the pseudo beauty of the wretched, deformed invalid, who at the dictates of the mode]-n Babylon has trampled reason and common sense, health and comfort, the happiness of self and the enjoyment of her posterity under foot. Teach the girls to be American ; to be independent ; to scorn to copy fashion, manners, or habits that come from decaying civilizations, and which outrage all sentiment of refinement, laws of life, or principles of common sense. The American girl is naturally independent and well endowed with reason and common sense. Once shown the wisdom and importance of this American movement, and she will not be slow to cordially embrace it. In many respects

30

the hour is most propitious, owing to a combination of causes never before present, among which may be mentioned the growing independence of American womanhood ; the enlarged vision that has come to her through the wonderfully diverse occupations and professions which she has recently embraced ; the growing consciousness of her ability to succeed in almost every vocation of life. The latitude enjoyed by her in matters of dress in the mountains and seashore resorts ; the growth of women's gymnasiums ; the emphasis given to hygienic instruction in schools, and the recent quiet intro- duction of a perfectly comfortable apparel for morning wear, which, strange to say, has originated where one would least expect, among the most fashionable belles of the Empire city.* This significant innovation which is reported by the daily press, as becoming quite popular among the young ladies of the wealthy districts of New York, consists of a comfortable blouse worn over knickerbocker trousers. Clad in this comfortable attire, the belles come to breakfast, nor do they subsequently change their dress during the morning if they intend remaining indoors. If a sedate or fastidious caller is announced, a beautiful tea-gown, which is at hand, is slipped into, and the young lady is appropriately clad to suit even conventional requirements. The bicycle and lawn tennis costumes now becoming so popular also exercise a subtile but marked influence in favor of rational dress reform, not only giving young ladies the wonderful comfort and health-o-iving' freedom which for a^es have been denied her sex, but also by accustoming them to these radically uncon- ventional costumes. f

*In speakinir i>f tliis ))ractical dress retorm on the jiart of the belles of New York, the Boston Ua'ihi (iluhr rt'cently observed editorially : The jireat question now agitating the fashionable women of Fifth Avenue is : " Do you wear knickerbockers? "

Stripped of all apologetic circumlocution, " knickerbockers" are simply loose, easy trousers, above which IS worn a becoming blouse waist, and thus attired, the belles of New York come down to breakfast. Nor are the trousers subsequently removed while the ladies are about the house, unless some conservative caller is announced, when a stylish tea-gown can be jumijed into in a second, and the lady is in faultless female costume.

That women should be handicapped in their locomotion in their own homes is simply a relic of oriental slavery and prudery, and the revolt against it is sensible and wholesome. That they have come to stay is evident, while improved costumes for shop girls, and other women engaged in business every day in the year, are certain to follow in the order of progress.— Boston Globe.

It might be well also for the council to recommend the formation of societies in each community where social or society gatherings of those interested might be lieM at stated intervals, at which all members would api^ear in dresses made with special regard to health, comfort, and beauty, and in which all garments would conform to the general ideal recommended by tlie council.

t As the paper is being set iip my attention has been attracted to a remarkably sensible signed editorial in the Boston Sunday Globe, of July 26, by the brilliant

31

Another encouraging sign of the times is the increasing demand on the great and fashionable house of liiberty & Co., of London, for the Greek and other simple cos- tumes by fashionable ladies, who are using them largely for home wear. I have re- produced two recent styles of dresses made by Liberty. All fabrics used are rich, soft, and elegant, and the effect is said to be gratifying to lovers of art, as well as far more healthful and comfor- table than the conventional dress. The most impor- tant fact, however, is the effect or influence which is sure to follow this breaking: away from the rulingr fash-

Soine of Liberty's recent dresses. GreciaD Costume.

The

ions in wealthy cir- cles. When conventionalism in dress is fully discredited, practical reform is certain to follow. The knell of the one means the triumph of the other.

Believing as I do that the cycle of woman

writer and sensible thinker, Adelaide A. Clafiin, from which I extract the foUowina: :

Bishop Coxe's fulmiuation against tlie riding of bicycles by women has attracted considerable attention, but to tlie student of social movements it is not strange that Bisliop Coxe should object. The real oddity is that scarcely anybody else, ai)par- ently, hasobjectei.

Tiiat young girls from the best families should within a short time have betaken themselves to whirling through the public thoroughfares, like so many boys, is certainly a new departure from all old fashioned canons of feminine decorum, at least as startling as many that have brought down all sorts of thunder- bolts from pulpit and press. Had it been a prerequisite that an amendment to the United States Constitution, or even a statute of a State Legislature should be obtained, the girls would doubtless liave liad to wait many a weary year.

It is not long since another church dignitary. Dr. Morgan Dix, objected to tlie entrance of girls into universities, because it was not " proper for young women to be exposed to the gaze ofyoung men, many of whom were less beut upon learning tlian upon amusement."

Some of Liberty's recent dresses. The Juliet.

32

has dawned, and that through lier humanity will reach a higher and nobler civilization than the world has yet known, I feel the most profound interest in all that affects her health, comfort, and happiness ; for as I have before observed, her exaltation means the elevation of the race. A broader liberty and more liberal meed of justice for her mean a higher civilization, and the solution of weighty and fundamental problems which will never be equitably adjusted until we have brought into political and social life more of the splendid spirit of altruism, which is one of her most conspic- uous characteristics. I believe that morality, education, practical reform, and enduring progress wait upon her com- plete emancipation from the bondage of fashion, prejudice, superstition, and conservatism.

However little she may realize it, every girl who rides her steel horse is a vivid illustration of one of the greatest waves of progress of this century, the advancement of women in freedom and (ii)ii()rtunity.

A wise physician once said that the opinion that a good woman should stay closely at home had killed more women than any other one cause. In the days of "our grand- mothers the suggestion of regular gymnastic training or athletics for girls would have been received with horror. It was hardly proper for a woman to have any knowledge of the construction of her physical system.

It is a curious historical fact that the first women lecturers upon physiology were women's rights women, and viewed by the majority of people as dangerous to female modesty, while the Ladies' Physiological Institute in Boston was at first much disapproved of by the clergy. " So long, too, as old-fashioned " stays " (laced up sometimes by the aid of equally old-fashioned bed-posts) remained in vogue, neither physiology nor athletics stood much chance with women.

But the often derided dress reformer has had her way, to a great extent. Bathing dresses, gymnastic and tennis suits which would have frightened an eighteenth century dame into one of her favorite fainting fits.

Meanwhile the girls have mounted their bicycles. Bless you, my children; what endless vistas of good times are before .you! "What glorious landscape views and ocean moonrises, what freedom, what fresh, airy delight in young life and strength !

Already one young doctor has departed with his bride on "a wedding tour to Texas, each upon a bicycle. Other strange affairs will no doubt take place. By and by the bishops will see no more irreverence in bidding Godspeed to girls starting on a journey to California upon bicycles thau to girls departing to Europe on a steamship.

THE ARENA.

The Arena, since its inception, has been more liospitable to women tlian any other a^reat review imblished in the civilized world. It has also ever been the champion of all means and measures looking toward the emancipation of woman. As an illustration of these important points we call attention to the Arena for Aujjust, 1892, which contains papers by

Mary A. Livermore, Mrs. B. P. Underwood,

Frances B. Willard, Mrs. Frances E. Russell,

Helen H. Gardener, Louise Chandler Moulton, Mrs. Gen. Lew Wallace,

and a sjmposium on WomtMis ('liit)s, to which the foUowini; ladies con- tribute : —

May "Wright Sewall, Ellen M. Mitchell,

Mary E. Mumford, Mary A. Livermore,

Mary E. Boyce, Kate Gannett Wells,

Louise Chandler Moulton, Katharine Nobles,

Hester M. Poole, Dr. Julia Holmes Smith. Annah Robinson Watson,

The September Arena for 1892 contains a symposium on AVoman's Dress, to which such well-known writers as the foHowinn' will contribute:

Octavia W. Bates, Grace Greenwood,

Frances E. Russell, May Wright Sewall,

Mrs. E. M. King, Elizabeth Smith Miller. Frances M. Steele,

Tills will be the most imi>ortant symposium on Woman's Dress that has ever appeared in a leadini^' ma,<;azine.

It is the determination of the management to make the Arena indis- pensable to all thoughtful, wide-awake women.

The Opinion of the Highest Literary Authority of Boston.

'I'he hold that this magazine lias taken upon the public is due wholly and solely to its intrinsic merits, and not to any elaborate or shrewd methods of advertising. It has won its own way, and in a straightforward and legitimate manner. No magazine in the country has taken higher ground in the treatment of (juestions dealing with social and political reform. Its contributors include some of the l)est know n n)en of the day in the walks of science, theology, and general literature, and there is no topic of public interest but readers may look to see broadly, thoroughly, and impartially treated. — Erenincj Transcript, Boston. Mass.

SUBSCRIPTION PRICE, $5.00, SINGLE COPIES, 50 cts.

A sample copy of the Arena will be forwarded, postpaid, for 20 cents, to any person wishing to examine the same with a view to subscribing.

ARENA PUBLISHING CO., COPLEY SQ., BOSTON, MASS.

Just Out.

A Brilliant Realistic Novel by the Author of "Is this Your Son, My Lord?

°5e

ublishincL" .,

(b.Q) ' y

"H 44 81

PRICE, PAPER, 50 CENTS; CLOTH, $1.00. ADDRESS ALL ORDERS

ARENA PUBLISHING CO., CopLEY S^,, BOSTON, flASS.

o-?\

>^ o.

rv^ . » •

<?>

^* .*?!§te»\ \/ ..ijxifi;-, *^

>„ <v oV^^^Pi'- '^. A ' •^jm^r.\ ^^ <v • ^^xwi^'*'' -^

oK

c^ ♦*

4^ •

•^0^

^ °o

/ ^^ ^-^, \'^

.• .^^^'V. V

\f^ N. MANCHESTER, # INDIANA 46962

-^■j -^ % M •■4 '4 '^ H -4 -i ^vi

4L .Hi '-^i

^n m #! %■ ' M/-^ #t ift '#

?.l	^, m	m	mi m
^ ^ -.	m 'i	M '^^	^
4 ' '	'■M m.	•^	m\ «	1
	i m •'	^t '	%
	•ii] ^		■■'? , A*	I
	i *		m	<3
^	^<«f 'v

.1 4 ■■«!

■..r- ..r--^ vf

w jir;> mr w^y ■

m m im h-^ lii !■•=

-%^K^^"' ^""* ^ ^**^^ ^-^ "'^^ '■ 1^^

- m u. f^ m ~m 0w )^ j^ r^- i^r j.%

rjf- •,.^.. .^^ ,..^. v.^ ...v . -. .^ ]f=*^ ^ ^; V

i^'l!!^. Wlgi

^ • ^ ' «l^ K. 'it^'P^ "te j?^' |# ■I'f: "¥' P^

M'-^ % ;j:i- *i A«*!^ ■«SP^ i%s 1^. )^A im- W^: \&^ ||-: ]^^ f/

li^ «« ;i^; ^. Mif- 'v^^ I- • ., ,, ,:'^ i.'- r-' 'i'^'ir ■ i^- ^a;''^. ■■■ V-.

I j^- *#" % '% ^ / '^^ ■ '* ^# # 'O n^ "'#^"

m ^ ^ ^ :^^

- HI :m- '^r ■

: . #: m- 0^ -i^- c*- ,

' ^ ' '^^ (t m ^ 1^^^ W m- i

^^^^■fraiMS?»3>>y'8P^''«WW3iW*i*Wig^^^B
■ ■■
■ ■ ■ mr^\
I	■ ■ mmmmr
■	IH ' Bi^B i^^H
1	■ ■■
■	■i ■■§ ■■ ^^H
1	■ ■■■
■ ■■■
1 1 ^H

	];■■ i

i^-:- |r

%, h' > w j^:^

S,J^^^;^,A,HAA^A

•]*' ]?^ .[?

m. 4

A 4

a '^ m % 4 \ >4

•'^ vd ' '^ -^at .;i ^i -^j "^^ .'it :

L :n,:::\.

'WS^

1	^	-
■ ■■
^^H^^^H| ^^^^_^^_ ^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^
■ ■■r	1

1 -K^ m ■%• -^^ 0 'S ' -^

"*^ H t- # -^ •■:\ '^ ^ar #: -j^.

. -^1^ "* # '^ ■%.